Referere til dette bildet andre steder på foto.no: klipp og lim følgende tekst (ta med klammeparentesene): {bilde_166883} Det vil da bli automagisk laget en link til bildet fra teksten din.
Ja, fine farger. Men jeg blir ikke helt tilfreds med
utsnittet, kanskje ikke vinkelen heller.
Taket og treverket over ødelegger litt.
Bildet kunne kanskje vært mørkere?
vh ingebjørg
Glenn S.
Hmm, er heller ikke helt tilfreds med utsnittet. Ville kanskje tatt av litt på toppen.
Men er et spennende motiv.
Steinulf L.
Morsomt motiv med mange detaljer.Hadde kanskje blitt enda bedre om du kapper himmelen.
Anders T.
Fine fager og spill i bildet. Er ikke enig at himmelen skal kappes bort, syntes den er med på å gjøre bilde spennende.
Jan v.
Artig motiv, rustikt. Masse farger og materialer. Fint perspektiv inn mot portenalen.
Dette kan være en påminner om at vi også her hjemme har mye av interesse, både av natur, bygd og by, og historiske steder.
Mvh Jan
Georg K.
three points about this image :
1.) I do not really understand the concept - showing something related to the past is fine, makes sense, is interesting and sometimes even pushing our imagination.
In this sense - I would have tried to follow this consequently - means concentrating on the point that it should deliver a ''view into the past '' - means leaving out the elements disturbing this impression ( three of them are too prominent in this image )
2.) If you are aiming for a contemporary documentation of this building how it looks nowadays - to my mind it is again not consequent enough - the contrast between old building - and modern life ( people, added signs of modern life etc. ) would need to be incl. in the image.
3.) The colours were mentioned a few times - to my surprise as a great plus. I do not really understand this approach - to my mind the colours are pushed too far - they are too light - I guess because the image might was a bit dark.
Isn't the saturation of red, green and blue in all three cases too light ?
I agree with all the so-called soft points ( history - interesting places close by - learning by strolling around etc. ) - but to my mind your image is not really there - it is not planed enough - I do not get the impression that I really understand what you had in mind when taking it - and posting it here.
None of this points is saying something about good - or bad - just my thoughts.
Stig Børre E.
Fint bilde fra et fint miljø. Men det blir litt tomt. Et menneske, en hund, en katt eller et eller annet hadde løftet bildet mange hakk.
StigB
Torstein T.
Enig med georg at de moderne elementene ødelagte stemmningen litt. Det ble litt for mange detaljer på en gang og man vet ikke hva man skal fokusere på. Veldig bra lys i bildet, fin eksponering. Og god dybde. Et utsnitt ville nok løfte bildet
Du må være logget inn for å kunne kommentere bildene på foto.no.
Ja, fine farger. Men jeg blir ikke helt tilfreds med
utsnittet, kanskje ikke vinkelen heller.
Taket og treverket over ødelegger litt.
Bildet kunne kanskje vært mørkere?
vh ingebjørg
Men er et spennende motiv.
Dette kan være en påminner om at vi også her hjemme har mye av interesse, både av natur, bygd og by, og historiske steder.
Mvh Jan
1.) I do not really understand the concept - showing something related to the past is fine, makes sense, is interesting and sometimes even pushing our imagination.
In this sense - I would have tried to follow this consequently - means concentrating on the point that it should deliver a ''view into the past '' - means leaving out the elements disturbing this impression ( three of them are too prominent in this image )
2.) If you are aiming for a contemporary documentation of this building how it looks nowadays - to my mind it is again not consequent enough - the contrast between old building - and modern life ( people, added signs of modern life etc. ) would need to be incl. in the image.
3.) The colours were mentioned a few times - to my surprise as a great plus. I do not really understand this approach - to my mind the colours are pushed too far - they are too light - I guess because the image might was a bit dark.
Isn't the saturation of red, green and blue in all three cases too light ?
I agree with all the so-called soft points ( history - interesting places close by - learning by strolling around etc. ) - but to my mind your image is not really there - it is not planed enough - I do not get the impression that I really understand what you had in mind when taking it - and posting it here.
None of this points is saying something about good - or bad - just my thoughts.
StigB